Comparison
Manual gluing
vs Gluebot
How does traditional manual gluing compare to an automated Gluebot? An objective comparison on the most important criteria.
| Criterion | Manual | Gluebot |
|---|---|---|
| Consistency | Variable per operator and shift | ✓ Identical result, every time |
| Health risk | Exposure to fumes and isocyanates | ✓ Operator works at safe distance |
| Operator dependency | High dependency on experience | ✓ No specialist knowledge required |
| Throughput speed | Limited by human speed | ✓ Continuous, 24/7 deployable |
| Adhesive consumption | Overdosing and waste | ✓ Precision dosing, minimal consumption |
| Traceability | None or limited | ✓ Full recording per product |
| Quality control | Visual spot check | ✓ Inline force measurement and monitoring |
| Adhesive type flexibility | Manual changeover | ✓ Recipe management, instant switching |
| Installation cost | Low (no investment) | ✓ Payback within 6-18 months |
| Scalability | Linear with staff | ✓ Easily expandable |